Sunday, July 19, 2009

Vivek Narayanan in Open Magazine


Turn to each case of a thriving, vigorous poetry community and a common thread seems to emerge, not a prefabricated mass audience, not international acclaim, but rather a culture of frank talk and close engagement, vivid with ferocious, voracious arguments, unending discussions, even intellectual fist fights or several rival aesthetic camps. Most of all, there is a deep awareness—even if an antagonistic awareness—of one’s own poetic history. And that is where we fall short.

Poetry, then, does need readers, a community to survive; but it is the intensity and not the size of that community that matters. In an insipid poetry/literature scene, including one saturated with publicity, an inability to muster enough historical awareness, informed critique, ruthless honesty and close, complete reading means that we turn our hopes outward, in a wish for love and affirmation from an imaginary audience that never shows up.


The whole thing here.

And the rest of the action here.

4 comments:

Falstaff said...

Nice.

Now if only they'd got the name of his book right.

Space Bar said...

Falsie: :D indeed.

equivocal said...

F-- That's hilarious-- I didn't even notice that. Strangely appropriate mistake, don't you think? Now I'm torn between writing to them and just letting it be as is!

Falstaff said...

equivocal: Yes, bizarrely apt.

Good article btw - I mostly agree, but then you already know that. I do have a few additional thoughts but I've decided to behave and turn them into an actual blog post at some point instead of doing my usual post-as-comment thing.